<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Literotica Upgrades: Voting Element + Add To Favorites</title>
	<link>http://manu.literotica.com/2008/01/15/lit-upgrades-voting-element-add-to-favorites/</link>
	<description>I figure all I need is a lobotomy and some tights</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: KellyD</title>
		<link>http://manu.literotica.com/2008/01/15/lit-upgrades-voting-element-add-to-favorites/#comment-47075</link>
		<dc:creator>KellyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://manu.literotica.com/2008/01/15/lit-upgrades-voting-element-add-to-favorites/#comment-47075</guid>
		<description>I think the 5 stars were self explaning, even the first time I saw them.  It is by far better then before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the 5 stars were self explaning, even the first time I saw them.  It is by far better then before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeBroz</title>
		<link>http://manu.literotica.com/2008/01/15/lit-upgrades-voting-element-add-to-favorites/#comment-27827</link>
		<dc:creator>LeBroz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://manu.literotica.com/2008/01/15/lit-upgrades-voting-element-add-to-favorites/#comment-27827</guid>
		<description>1. I've seen some of the reactions and have reconsidered my earlier thought of having a Lock-In Vote button. After all, you want it to have that single click feature. But how to address concerns of hitting a wrong star? Right now, once one is selected, it's too late. Liar came up with an idea for an Undo button. Don't know if that'll work or not. Would that Undo button still be there on later views, with the result that someone could keep changing a vote? As a possible alternative, could the vote feature include a time-delay of, say, ten seconds, during which time a reader could change their vote. Or once the reader leaves the page the vote is automatically locked in.

I also like some of the ideas that some have proposed of marking the stars (either 1-5 or A-F). I'd assume that it'd be easier for the blank stars to have that feature added, rather than the gold stars.

2. Excellent evolutionary change on those Add To buttons, especially the way they now separate the story text from the following Lit template. Any thoughts yet on increasing the number of favorites as I'd mentioned in November? I'd been thinking that perhaps an increase to 25 might be nice. Gives the reader some more flexibility yet it seems to be a reasonable under control number.

Have fun balancing everyone's suggestions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. I&#8217;ve seen some of the reactions and have reconsidered my earlier thought of having a Lock-In Vote button. After all, you want it to have that single click feature. But how to address concerns of hitting a wrong star? Right now, once one is selected, it&#8217;s too late. Liar came up with an idea for an Undo button. Don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;ll work or not. Would that Undo button still be there on later views, with the result that someone could keep changing a vote? As a possible alternative, could the vote feature include a time-delay of, say, ten seconds, during which time a reader could change their vote. Or once the reader leaves the page the vote is automatically locked in.</p>
<p>I also like some of the ideas that some have proposed of marking the stars (either 1-5 or A-F). I&#8217;d assume that it&#8217;d be easier for the blank stars to have that feature added, rather than the gold stars.</p>
<p>2. Excellent evolutionary change on those Add To buttons, especially the way they now separate the story text from the following Lit template. Any thoughts yet on increasing the number of favorites as I&#8217;d mentioned in November? I&#8217;d been thinking that perhaps an increase to 25 might be nice. Gives the reader some more flexibility yet it seems to be a reasonable under control number.</p>
<p>Have fun balancing everyone&#8217;s suggestions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
